Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The results of two studies support the contention that teaching metacognitive strategies with the aid of software packages enhances positive transfer of reading comprehension and writing skills. The first study investigated reading comprehension. 140 5th graders, very able learners, were divided into 4 groups which received, respectively, 15 hours of: (a) metacognitive instruction + clozes; (b) traditional instruction of clozes; (c) metacognitive instruction of complete texts and (d) traditional instruction of complete texts. The second study focused on teaching writing skills. 136 7th graders, very able learners, were divided into 4 groups which received, respectively, 48 hours of (a) metacognitive instruction plus Nvo, a writing-skills software package; (b) metacognitive instruction plus Qtext, a word processor; (c) traditional instruction plus Nvo and (d) traditional instruction plus Qtext. Results showed a greater improvement in learning and positive transfer in the group which received metacognitive instruction and used Nvo. The results of both studies show the efficiency of teaching reading and writing processes metacognitively, in integrating computerized environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaniel et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: