Key result
Discontinuation of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared to current use (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.02-2.12).
Why the study?
DOAC discontinuation is common and increases the risk of ischemic stroke onset, but its specific association in patients with NVAF needed to be estimated.
Does DOAC discontinuation increase the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Case-Control
Does DOAC discontinuation increase the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 1.47 (95% CI 1.02–2.12)
Discontinuation of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation is associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke, particularly in the 2 to 3 months following interruption.
Supports caution with DOAC interruptions in AF; leaves open causal confirmation and optimal timing via prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Although direct oral anticoagulants' (DOACs) prescriptions have experienced immense growth in the last decade, the proportion of discontinuers is still common yielding an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) onset. AIMS: We aimed to estimate the association between DOACs discontinuation and risk of IS among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS: We used data from a cohort of new DOACs users, followed patients from the first DOAC prescription date up to IS (index date) and conducted a nested case-control analysis using conditional logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals were calculated for discontinuation of DOACs (current use compared with past use). The latter, subdivided among those stopping treatment 3 to 2 months and 6 and 3 months prior to index date. The effect of naïve current users against IS onset compared with non-naïve current users was also evaluated. RESULTS: DOACs discontinuation showed an OR of IS of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.02-2.12); estimates were 2.51 (95% CI: 1.84-3.42) for whom discontinued treatment within months 3 and 2 and 1.43 (95% CI: 0.96-2.13) for those between months 6 and 3 prior to index date. Analyzing DOACs individually, risk of IS associated with past users compared with current users: 1.98 (95% CI: 1.25-3.12) for apixaban, 1.38 (95% CI: 0.40-4.72) for edoxaban, 1.98 (95% CI: 1.24-2.65) for dabigatran and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.26-2.76) for rivaroxaban. Similar results were found when stratified by naïve and non-naïve users. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs' discontinuation is associated with higher risk of IS, especially in the second and third months following interruption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomsen et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). DOACs discontinuation vs. Current use of DOACs was evaluated on ischemic stroke (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02-2.12). Discontinuation of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared to current use (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.02-2.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: