Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the distribution and interpretational variability of bare nouns and [classifier+noun] phrases in Cantonese and Mandarin. We argue that bare nouns are never bare in structure and that [classifier+noun] phrases may have more structure than just Classifier Phrase. We show that the lack of articles and number morphology in Cantonese/Mandarin leads to many interesting differences between Chinese-type languages and English-/Italian-type languages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: