Defining instructional design expertise has been a concern among scholars for many years. Understanding expertise and expert performance is complex due to the nature of ill-structured problems and the variety of contexts in which instructional designers work. If the field seeks to effectively prepare designers and enhance performance in existing professionals, a unified understanding and definition of expertise is needed. This 25-year review evaluated existing definitions in well-established literature. Findings revealed a lack of a clear, consistently used definition. Scholars predominately used expert characteristics to conceptualize expertise. A synthesis of these characteristics illuminated three traits of expert instructional designers: knowledge, skills, and dispositions. These traits informed the creation of a new definition. Innovations in research, theory, and practice are discussed which would provide new avenues for understanding, developing, and evaluating expertise over the next 25 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katherine Chartier (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Performance Improvement Quarterly