Key result
Development of a high right ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (≥33 mmHg) during upright exercise was associated with a higher peak cardiac index (8.3 vs 5.7 L/min/m2) and lower peak right atrial pressure, suggesting a normal physiologic response rather than right heart failure.
Why the study?
Does the development of a right ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient during upright exercise indicate adverse hemodynamics in patients undergoing invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
Observational (n=294)
No
Does the development of a right ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient during upright exercise indicate adverse hemodynamics in patients undergoing invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing?
The development of a systolic RV-PA pressure gradient during upright exercise is associated with favorable hemodynamics and may represent a normal physiologic finding in aerobically fit young people rather than right heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform invasive exercise testing interpretation; leaves open prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance.
BACKGROUND: We recently reported a novel observation that many patients with equal resting supine right ventricular(RV) and pulmonary artery(PA) systolic pressures develop an RV outflow tract(RVOT) pressure gradient during upright exercise. The current work details the characteristics of patients who develop such an RVOT gradient. METHODS: We studied 294 patients (59.7±15.5 years-old, 49% male) referred for clinical invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing, who did not have a resting RVOT pressure gradient defined by the simultaneously measured peak-to-peak difference between RV and PA systolic pressures. RESULTS: The magnitude of RVOT gradient did not correspond to clinical or hemodynamic findings suggestive of right heart failure; rather, higher gradients were associated with favorable exercise findings. The presence of a high peak RVOT gradient (90th percentile, ≥33mmHg) was associated with male sex (70 vs. 46%, p = 0.01), younger age (43.6±17.7 vs. 61.8±13.9 years, p<0.001), lower peak right atrial pressure (5 [3-7] vs. 8 [4-12]mmHg, p<0.001), higher peak heart rate (159±19 vs. 124±26 beats per minute, p<0.001), and higher peak cardiac index (8.3±2.3 vs. 5.7±1.9 L/min/m2, p<0.001). These associations persisted when treating peak RVOT as a continuous variable and after age and sex adjustment. At peak exercise, patients with a high exercise RVOT gradient had both higher RV systolic pressure (78±11 vs. 66±17 mmHg, p<0.001) and lower PA systolic pressure (34±8 vs. 50±19 mmHg, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Development of a systolic RV-PA pressure gradient during upright exercise is not associated with an adverse hemodynamic exercise response and may represent a normal physiologic finding in aerobically fit young people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riel et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Unexplained exertional intolerance (n=294). High peak right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pressure gradient (≥33 mmHg) vs. Peak RVOT pressure gradient <33 mmHg was evaluated on Peak cardiac index (L/min/m2) (p=<0.001). Development of a high right ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (≥33 mmHg) during upright exercise was associated with a higher peak cardiac index (8.3 vs 5.7 L/min/m2) and lower peak right atrial pressure, suggesting a normal physiologic response rather than right heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: