Key result
Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) significantly discriminated healthy subjects from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients and high-risk from low-risk patients better than traditional measures.
Why the study?
Does the Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) method improve risk prediction for sudden cardiac death in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy compared to traditional measures?
Observational
Does the Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) method improve risk prediction for sudden cardiac death in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy compared to traditional measures?
Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging of Holter recordings may improve sudden cardiac death risk stratification in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy by better characterizing autonomic modulations.
May support PRSA for SCD risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the suitability of the Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) method for improved risk prediction in cardiac patients. Moreover, this technique, which separately evaluates acceleration and deceleration processes of cardiac rhythm, allows the effect of sympathetic and vagal modulations of beat-to-beat intervals to be characterized. Holter recordings of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) patients were analyzed: high-risk (HR), who suffered sudden cardiac death (SCD) during the follow-up; and low-risk (LR), without any kind of cardiac-related death. Moreover, a control group of healthy subjects was analyzed. PRSA indexes were analyzed, for different time scales T and wavelet scales s, from RR series of 24 h-ECG recordings, awake periods and sleep periods. Also, the behavior of these indexes from simulated data was analyzed and compared with real data results. Outcomes demonstrated the PRSA capacity to significantly discriminate healthy subjects from IDC patients and HR from LR patients on a higher level than traditional temporal and spectral measures. The behavior of PRSA indexes agrees with experimental evidences related to cardiac autonomic modulations. Also, these parameters reflect more regularity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in HR patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bas et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) vs. Traditional temporal and spectral measures was evaluated on Discrimination between healthy subjects and IDC patients, and high-risk from low-risk patients. Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA) significantly discriminated healthy subjects from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients and high-risk from low-risk patients better than traditional measures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: