Key result
Average quantitative T1 (qT1) Z-scores in white matter lesions were significantly associated with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis patients (β = 0.178; 97.5% CI 0.030-0.326; p=0.019).
Why the study?
To further develop personalized quantitative T1 abnormality maps by modeling age dependence and assess their relationship with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.
Do personalized quantitative T1 abnormality maps correlate with clinical disability in patients with multiple sclerosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=217)
Do personalized quantitative T1 abnormality maps correlate with clinical disability in patients with multiple sclerosis?
Personalized qT1 abnormality maps in MS patients correlate with clinical disability, suggesting potential utility for assessing disease burden in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
qT1 maps may aid MS disability assessment; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Quantitative MRI (qMRI) has greatly improved the sensitivity and specificity of microstructural brain pathology in multiple sclerosis (MS) when compared to conventional MRI (cMRI). More than cMRI, qMRI also provides means to assess pathology within the normal-appearing and lesion tissue. In this work, we further developed a method providing personalized quantitative T1 (qT1) abnormality maps in individual MS patients by modeling the age dependence of qT1 alterations. In addition, we assessed the relationship between qT1 abnormality maps and patients’ disability, in order to evaluate the potential value of this measurement in clinical practice. We included 119 MS patients (64 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 34 secondary progressive MS (SPMS), 21 primary progressive MS (PPMS)), and 98 Healthy Controls (HC). All individuals underwent 3T MRI examinations, including Magnetization Prepared 2 Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echoes (MP2RAGE) for qT1 maps and High-Resolution 3D Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) imaging. To calculate personalized qT1 abnormality maps, we compared qT1 in each brain voxel in MS patients to the average qT1 obtained in the same tissue (grey/white matter) and region of interest (ROI) in healthy controls, hereby providing individual voxel-based Z-score maps. The age dependence of qT1 in HC was modeled using linear polynomial regression. We computed the average qT1 Z-scores in white matter lesions (WMLs), normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), cortical grey matter lesions (GMcLs) and normal-appearing cortical grey matter (NAcGM). Lastly, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model with the backward selection including age, sex, disease duration, phenotype, lesion number, lesion volume and average Z-score (NAWM/NAcGM/WMLs/GMcLs) was used to assess the relationship between qT1 measures and clinical disability (evaluated with EDSS). The average qT1 Z-score was higher in WMLs than in NAWM. (WMLs: 1.366 ± 0.409, NAWM: −0.133 ± 0.288, [mean ± SD], p < 0.001). The average Z-score in NAWM in RRMS patients was significantly lower than in PPMS patients (p = 0.010). The MLR model showed a strong association between average qT1 Z-scores in white matter lesions (WMLs) and EDSS (R2 = 0.549, β = 0.178, 97.5 % CI = 0.030 to 0.326, p = 0.019). Specifically, we measured a 26.9 % increase in EDSS per unit of qT1 Z-score in WMLs in RRMS patients (R2 = 0.099, β = 0.269, 97.5 % CI = 0.078 to 0.461, p = 0.007). We showed that personalized qT1 abnormality maps in MS patients provide measures related to clinical disability, supporting the use of those maps in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Multiple sclerosis (n=217). Quantitative T1 (qT1) abnormality maps vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Clinical disability (evaluated with EDSS) (β = 0.178, 95% CI 0.030 to 0.326, p=0.019). Average quantitative T1 (qT1) Z-scores in white matter lesions were significantly associated with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis patients (β = 0.178; 97.5% CI 0.030-0.326; p=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: