Why the study?
Does docetaxel plus cisplatin improve objective response rate and time to progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines?
Does docetaxel plus cisplatin improve objective response rate and time to progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines?
Docetaxel plus cisplatin is an active and safe salvage chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines.
May support docetaxel-cisplatin as salvage option in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer; leaves open comparative efficacy in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are frequently exposed to high cumulative doses of anthracyclines and are at risk of resistance and cardiotoxicity. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus cisplatin, as salvage chemotherapy in patients with MBC resistant to prior anthracyclines. METHODS: Patients with MBC that had progressed after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen containing anthracyclines received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: Between Jan 2000 and May 2002, 24 patients with tumors primary resistant and 15 with secondary resistant disease were accrued. All 39 patients were evaluable for safety and 36 for efficacy. The objective response rate was 31% (95% CI, 16-45%) with 3 complete responses. The median time to disease progression was 7 months, and the median overall survival was 23 months (median follow-up of 41 months). Neutropenia was the most frequently observed severe hematologic toxicity (39% of patients), whereas asthenia and nausea were the most common non-hematologic toxicities. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found docetaxel plus cisplatin to be an active and safe chemotherapy regimen for patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: