Key result
Routine preoperative testing in a developing country revealed abnormal results in up to 35% of cases and accounted for 43.6% of the causes for delayed surgery.
Why the study?
Does routine preoperative laboratory testing impact surgical scheduling in patients undergoing non-urgent surgery in a developing country?
Observational (n=201)
No
Does routine preoperative laboratory testing impact surgical scheduling in patients undergoing non-urgent surgery in a developing country?
Routine preoperative testing in a low-resource setting frequently yields abnormal results that lead to changes in surgical management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May delay non-urgent surgery in low-resource settings; hypothesis-generating for selective testing protocols.
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of anesthetic risks is an essential component of preoperative evaluation. In developing world, preanesthesia evaluation may be challenging because patient's medical history and records are scare, and language barrier limits physical examination. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of routine preoperative testing in a low-resources setting. METHODS: Prospective observational study performed in a French forward surgical unit in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. 201 patients who were scheduled for non urgent surgery were screened with routine laboratory exams during preoperative evaluation. Changes in surgery were assessed (delayed or scheduled). RESULTS: Abnormal hemoglobin findings were reported in 35% of patients, abnormal WBC count in 11,1% of patients, abnormal platelets in 15,3% of patients. Positive HIV results were found in 8,3% of cases. Routine tests represented 43,6% of changes causes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that in a developing country, routine preoperative tests showed abnormal results up to 35% of cases, and represented 43,5% of delayed surgery causes. The rate of tests leading to management changes varied widely, from 0% to 8,3%. These results suggested that selected tests would be useful to diagnose diseases that required treatment before non urgent surgery. However, larger studies are needeed to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio and the clinical impact of such a strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bordes et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Scheduled for non-urgent surgery (n=201). Routine preoperative testing was evaluated on Changes in surgery (delayed or scheduled). Routine preoperative testing in a developing country revealed abnormal results in up to 35% of cases and accounted for 43.6% of the causes for delayed surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: