Key result
Hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 > 3.0%) significantly increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to physiologic fibrinolysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HR 2.275).
Why the study?
There was limited prognostic information regarding fibrinolytic dysregulation in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Does fibrinolytic dysregulation (hyperfibrinolysis or fibrinolysis shutdown) increase the risk of MACEs in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=338)
No
Does fibrinolytic dysregulation (hyperfibrinolysis or fibrinolysis shutdown) increase the risk of MACEs in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Hazard Ratio: 2.275 (95% CI 1.241–4.172)
Absolute Event Rate: 32.9% vs 19.2%
p-value: p=0.003
Hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 > 3%) detected by thromboelastography is independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: Dual antiplatelet therapy can reduce coronary thrombosis and improve the prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there was limited prognostic information about fibrinolytic dysregulation in patients with ACS. This study is aimed to evaluated the prevalence and impact of fibrinolytic dysregulation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed coagulation and fibrinolysis related indexes of ACS in hospitalized adults with rapid thrombelastography between May 2016 and December 2018. All of the follow-up visits were ended by December 2019. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which included unstable angina pectoris, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal cerebral infarction, heart failure and all-cause death. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients were finally included with an average age of 62.5 ± 12.8 years old, 273 (80.5%) were males, 137(40.5%) patients were with ST-elevation myocardial infraction. Fibrinolysis shutdown (LY30<0.8%) and hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 >3.0%) were observed among 163 (48.2%) and 76(22.5%) patients, respectively. During a total of 603.2 person·years of follow-up period, 77 MACEs occurred (22.8%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that LY30 [HR: 1.101, 95% CI: 1.010-1.200, P = 0.028] was independently correlated with the occurrence of MACEs. The hazard ratios pertaining to MACEs in patients with fibrinolysis shutdown and hyperfibrinolysis compared with those in the physiologic range (LY30: 0.8-3.0%) were 1.196 [HR: 1.196, 95% CI: 0.679-2.109,P = 0.535] and 2.275 [HR: 2.275, 95% CI: 1.241-4.172, P = 0.003], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinolytic dysregulation is very common in selected patients with ACS, and hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 > 3%) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=338). Hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 > 3.0%) vs. Physiologic fibrinolysis (LY30 0.8-3.0%) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 2.275, 95% CI 1.241-4.172, p=0.003). Hyperfibrinolysis (LY30 > 3.0%) significantly increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to physiologic fibrinolysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HR 2.275).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: