Grape cane is a viticultural byproduct rich in bioactive stilbenoids and other phenolic compounds. Valorization of grape cane relies on effective extraction methods, traditionally using ethanol. This study aimed to compare a series of extraction techniques, including an extraction based on various ethanol–water mixtures as well as water-based methods combined with ultrasound-assisted extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. In this study, water-based extraction led to stilbenoid extraction yields determined by HPLC-DAD analyses that were significantly lower, even when applying ultrasound (43 mg/kg grape cane), than those obtained with 80 % ethanol maceration (4373 mg/kg). Water-based extraction utilizing microwave heating at optimal conditions (100 °C, 20 min) allowed yields of about 555 mg/kg. The spectrophotometrically measured total phenolic content showed a similar trend, with the highest yield achieved at 100 °C for 20 min under microwave-assisted extraction (13 g GAE /kg), remaining notably lower compared to using 80 % ethanol (20 g GAE /kg). These findings highlight the potential of increased temperature water-based extraction methods but also underscore the need for further optimization. Future research should aim to refine these techniques and explore more advanced methods, such as subcritical or high-pressure water extraction, to enhance the valorization of grape cane and support its use in producing bioactive extracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andlauer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: