Key result
This review summarizes the genetic regulation and heterogeneous development of the sinoatrial node, highlighting the Shox2-Nkx2-5 epistatic antagonism and recent genome-wide regulatory networks.
This review summarizes the genetic and developmental pathways of the sinoatrial node and embryonic venous pole, highlighting the Shox2-Nkx2-5 epistatic antagonism in pacemaker development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform AF trigger mapping from venous pole derivatives; leaves open Shox2-targeted therapies pending validation.
The definitive sinoatrial node (SAN), the primary pacemaker of the mammalian heart, develops from part of pro-pacemaking embryonic venous pole that expresses both Hcn4 and the transcriptional factor Shox2. It is noted that ectopic pacemaking activities originated from the myocardial sleeves of the pulmonary vein and systemic venous return, both derived from the Shox2+ pro-pacemaking cells in the venous pole, cause atrial fibrillation. However, the developmental link between the pacemaker properties in the embryonic venous pole cells and the SAN remains largely uncharacterized. Furthermore, the genetic program for the development of heterogeneous populations of the SAN is also under-appreciated. Here, we review the literature for a better understanding of the heterogeneous development of the SAN in relation to that of the sinus venosus myocardium and pulmonary vein myocardium. We also attempt to revisit genetic models pertinent to the development of pacemaker activities in the perspective of a Shox2-Nkx2-5 epistatic antagonism. Finally, we describe recent efforts in deciphering the regulatory networks for pacemaker development by genome-wide approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2015) conducted a review in Sinoatrial node development. This review summarizes the genetic regulation and heterogeneous development of the sinoatrial node, highlighting the Shox2-Nkx2-5 epistatic antagonism and recent genome-wide regulatory networks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: