Key result
Antiplatelet therapy trials for ischaemic heart disease have systematically excluded patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, resulting in an evidence vacuum and treatment inequity.
This review highlights the critical evidence gap and resulting treatment inequity regarding antiplatelet therapy safety and efficacy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and ischaemic heart disease.
May warrant caution with P2Y12 inhibitors in ESKD; leaves open dedicated safety trials in dialysis patients.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite evidence-based therapies significantly improving cardiovascular mortality outcomes in the general population and those with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, this risk reduction has not translated to patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Absent from all major antiplatelet trials, this has led to insufficient safety data for P2Y12 inhibitor prescriptions and treatment inequity in this subpopulation. This review article presents an overview of the progression of research in understanding antiplatelet therapy for ischaemic heart disease in patients with advanced CKD (defined as eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Beyond trial recruitment strategies, new approaches should focus on registry documentation by CKD stage, risk stratification with biomarkers associated with inflammation and haemorrhage and building a knowledge base on optimal duration of dual and single antiplatelet therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varian et al. (2022) conducted a review in ischaemic heart disease and advanced chronic kidney disease. antiplatelet therapy was evaluated. Antiplatelet therapy trials for ischaemic heart disease have systematically excluded patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, resulting in an evidence vacuum and treatment inequity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: