NMR spectroscopy of 13C-labeled human low density lipoprotein (LDL) has been employed to characterize the lysine (Lys) residues in apo B-100. Reductive methylation with [13C]formaldehyde converts up to two-thirds of the Lys to the dimethylamino derivative; this pool of Lys is exposed at the surface of the LDL particle. The [13C]dimethyl-Lys which are visualized exhibit resonances at chemical shifts of 42.8 and 43.2 ppm (pH 7.6) indicating that they exist in two different microenvironments; this is a reflection of the native conformation of apo B associated with lipid, because the labeled, reduced, and alkylated protein gives a single resonance when dissolved in 7 M guanidine hydrochloride. The pH dependences of the Lys chemical shifts indicate that the two types of Lys titrate with different pK values; "active" Lys have a pK of 8.9, while "normal" Lys have a pK of 10.5. About 53 active Lys and 172 normal Lys are exposed on the surface of LDL with the remaining 132 Lys which are present in the human apo B-100 molecule being buried and unavailable for methylation. Addition of paramagnetic ions indicates that the active and normal Lys have different exposures to the aqueous phase; apparently this is a reflection of folding of the apo B molecule. The relative involvement of active and normal Lys in binding of apo B-100 to the LDL receptor on fibroblasts was explored by measuring the decrease in receptor binding as a function of the degree of methylation of the two types of Lys. Upper limits of 21 active and 31 normal Lys in the entire apo B-100 molecule are involved in the binding of LDL to the receptor. It is likely that these Lys are located in domains of apo B which contain clusters of basic amino acid residues and also bind heparin. If the sequence corresponding to apo B-48 (residues 1-2151) which does not bind to the receptor is excluded, then the above limits are halved; an upper limit of 10 active Lys may be particularly involved in receptor binding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lund‐Katz et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: