Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper initiates the efforts to design an intelligent/cognitive nano receiver operating in terahertz band. Specifically, we investigate two essential ingredients of an intelligent nano receiver-modulation mode detection (to differentiate between pulse-based modulation and carrier-based modulation) and modulation classification (to identify the exact modulation scheme in use). To implement modulation mode detection, we construct a binary hypothesis test in nano-receiver's passband and provide closed-form expressions for the two error probabilities. As for modulation classification, we aim to represent the received signal of interest by a Gaussian mixture model (GMM). This necessitates the explicit estimation of the THz channel impulse response and its subsequent compensation (via deconvolution). We then learn the GMM parameters via expectation-maximization algorithm. We then do Gaussian approximation of each mixture density to compute symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence in order to differentiate between various modulation schemes (i.e., M -ary phase shift keying and M -ary quadrature amplitude modulation). The simulation results on mode detection indicate that there exists a unique Pareto-optimal point (for both SNR and the decision threshold), where both error probabilities are minimized. The main takeaway message by the simulation results on modulation classification is that for a pre-specified probability of correct classification, higher SNR is required to correctly identify a higher order modulation scheme. On a broader note, this paper should trigger the interest of the community in the design of intelligent/cognitive nano receivers (capable of performing various intelligent tasks, e.g., modulation prediction, and so on).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iqbal et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: