Why the study?
Does SPECT radionuclide angiography using SPECT-35% or SPECT-QBS provide better interstudy precision and reliability for right ventricular function compared to equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography in patients with chronic coronary artery disease?
Does SPECT radionuclide angiography using SPECT-35% or SPECT-QBS provide better interstudy precision and reliability for right ventricular function compared to equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography in patients with chronic coronary artery disease?
SPECT radionuclide angiography, particularly using the SPECT-35% processing method, provides good interstudy reproducibility for quantifying right ventricular function, outperforming planar radionuclide angiography.
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiograph-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radionuclide angiography provides accurate measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. AIM: In this study, we report the interstudy precision and reliability of SPECT radionuclide angiography for the measurement of global systolic right ventricular function using two, three-dimensional volume processing methods (SPECT-QBS, SPECT-35%). These were compared with equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography. METHODS: Ten patients with chronic coronary artery disease having two SPECT and planar radionuclide angiography acquisitions were included. RESULTS: For the right ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume, the interstudy precision and reliability were better with SPECT-35% than with SPECT-QBS. The sample sizes needed to objectify a change in right ventricular volumes or ejection fraction were lower with SPECT-35% than with SPECT-QBS. The interstudy precision and reliability of SPECT-35% and SPECT-QBS for the right ventricle were better than those of equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography, but poorer than those previously reported for the left ventricle with SPECT radionuclide angiography on the same population. CONCLUSION: SPECT-35% and SPECT-QBS present good interstudy precision and reliability for right ventricular function, with the results favouring the use of SPECT-35%. The results are better than those of equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography, but poorer than those previously reported for the left ventricle with SPECT radionuclide angiography. They need to be confirmed in a larger population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daou et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: