The prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected micrometastases (N1a-IHC) in conventionally negative lymph nodes (N0) and its association with newer prognostic factors is controversial. Axillary lymph nodes (n= 2,528) of 159 patients with pT1–T N0 M0-breast cancer were examined for micrometastases using a monoclonal cytokeratine antibody. In addition to the histological findings, estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR), S-Phase, ploidy, EGF-R, p53, Ki-67, HER-2/neu oncoprotein, cathepsin D, and p52 were investigated. The mean follow up time was 51 ± 16 months. Micrometastases were detected in 53 of 2,528 (2.1%) lymph nodes. In 18 of 159 patients (11.3%) staged as N0 by conventional histology, one or more micrometastases were detected immunohistochemically. These patients have a prognostic disadvantage compared with N0-IHC-patients significant for distant metastases-free survival; (p =.003) and for overall survival (p =.006). Differences (p <.05) between N0-IHC- and N1a-IHC-tumors were found in tumor size, ER, EGF-R, and cathepsin D. Tumor size, grading “3,” and peritumoral vessel invasion, but not the detection of micrometastases, were confirmed as independent prognostic factors in node-negative patients by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Immunohistochemically detected micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes are of prognostic importance. However, they are not independent prognostic factors, because a correlation with other prognostic factors has been proven.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerber et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: