Why the study?
DOACs targeting FXa or thrombin may mediate differential vascular effects through protease-activated receptors, prompting investigation into their potential effects on vascular integrity.
In an in vitro model, dabigatran, unlike rivaroxaban, fails to protect endothelial barrier function due to proteolytically inactive thrombin interacting with PAR-1 via exosite-I, suggesting differential vascular effects among DOACs.
Dabigatran may fail to preserve endothelial integrity unlike rivaroxaban; leaves open differential microvascular effects of DOACs in AF.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can lead to the loss of microvascular integrity thereby enhancing AF progression. Mechanistically, the pro-coagulant state that drives the risk of stroke in patients with AF may also play a causal role in microvascular loss. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the preferred anticoagulants for AF, can target factors upstream (factor Xa [FXa]) or downstream (thrombin) in the coagulation cascade and mediate differential vascular effects through interaction with protease-activated receptors (PARs). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential effect of different DOACs on vascular integrity. METHODS: To model the impact of DOACs on vascular integrity, we utilized platelet-free plasma in thrombin generation assays and endothelial barrier assays under identical experimental conditions. These multifactorial systems provide all coagulation factors and their respective natural inhibitors in physiological ratios in combination with the pro-coagulant endothelial surface on which coagulation is initiated. Furthermore, the system provides pro- and anti-barrier factors and monitoring both assays simultaneously permits coupling of thrombin kinetics to endothelial barrier dynamics. RESULTS: We provide evidence that the anti-FXa DOAC rivaroxaban and the anti-thrombin DOAC dabigatran are efficient in blocking their target proteases. However, while rivaroxaban could preserve endothelial barrier function, dabigatran failed to protect endothelial integrity over time, which could be prevented in the presence of a custom-made peptide that blocks thrombin's exosite-I. CONCLUSIONS: Proteolytically inactive thrombin in complex with dabigatran evokes loss of barrier function that can be prevented by a protease-activated receptor-1 mimicking peptide blocking thrombin's exosite-I.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dólleman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: