Why the study?
Does cardiomyoplasty improve hemodynamics, LVEF, and symptoms in patients with severe chronic heart failure?
Does cardiomyoplasty improve hemodynamics, LVEF, and symptoms in patients with severe chronic heart failure?
Cardiomyoplasty may provide symptomatic improvement and increased LVEF in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy for whom transplantation is contraindicated.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiomyoplasty was introduced into clinical practice in 1985 by Alain Carpentier. Since then, the procedure has been performed on more than 400 patients worldwide. The latissimus dorsi muscle is prepared maintaining the vascular supply, then the muscle flap is wrapped around the heart and connected to a cardiomyostimulator. The muscle is later stimulated synchronously with ventricular systole to augment the cardiac contractility. METHODS: To evaluate the long-term outcome of cardiomyoplasty, we investigated 3 patients electively undergoing this procedure in our hospital. All of these patients (2 male, 1 female) had severe chronic heart failure which did not respond to optimal medical treatment. The mean follow-up time was 42 months (range 24 - 60). All patients showed symptoms corresponding to NYHA class III, and one patient intermittently showed class IV despite conventional medical therapy. Patients were evaluated at 6-month intervals for 2 years with right heart catheterization, radionuclide scans, echocardiography, as well as questionnaires for assessing quality of life. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. One patient experienced sudden death 2 years after operation. There were no significant changes in hemodynamic variables at 6, 12 or 24 months after surgery, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 20.0 ( 9.2 to 40.0 +/- 7.1 % (p = 0.05) 1 year after operation. Considerable improvement of symptoms was seen in all, and 1 patient returned to work. NYHA-class decreased from 3.1 to 2.0 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following cardiomyoplasty, patients may exhibit impressive clinical improvement with less striking changes of objective hemodynamic parameters. Thus, in our patients, dynamic cardiomyoplasty improves quality of life. We do not consider this treatment to be an alternative to heart transplantation. It does, however, provide a therapeutic option for patients for whom transplantation is contraindicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Driever et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Women and heart diseaseMore from The International Journal of Artificial Organs