Cf resistance proteins of tomato that provide resistance against the extracellular fungal pathogen Fulvia fulva are receptor-like proteins (RLPs) localized at the cell surface. As they lack a cytoplasmic kinase domain, Cf proteins require 2 co-receptors to activate downstream immune responses. In the resting state, Cf proteins constitutively interact with the receptor-like kinase (RLK) SUPPRESSOR OF BIR1-1 (SOBIR1), whereas upon recognition of the matching avirulence (Avr) effector, the RLK BRI1-ASSOCIATED KINASE 1 (BAK1) is recruited. Cf proteins have a typical leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RLP structure, consisting of an LRR ectodomain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular juxtamembrane domain that is referred to as the C-terminal tail. Cf-4 and Cf-9 have identical C-terminal tails, while the C-terminal tails of Cf-2 and Cf-5 differ by a single amino acid. Interestingly, the Cf-5/Avr5- and Cf-2/Avr2-triggered immune response results in a slower and weaker hypersensitive response (HR)-related cell death than the response triggered by Cf-4/Avr4 and Cf-9/Avr9. Domain swapping between Cf-5 and Cf-9 revealed that the C-terminal tail plays a specific role in determining the intensity of the immune response. Notably, the pool of SOBIR1-associated Cf-4 and Cf-9 proteins is much larger than that of Cf-2 and Cf-5, and a full-length C-terminal tail is required for immune signaling activation. This work provides a basis for further studies on RLP engineering to enhance crop resistance against detrimental pathogens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: