Why the study?
Is caudal epidural blockade safe for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients with intra-abdominal infectious processes?
Is caudal epidural blockade safe for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients with intra-abdominal infectious processes?
This case series and review suggests that caudal epidural blockade may be safe in pediatric patients with intra-abdominal infections, despite theoretical concerns regarding bacteremia.
Hypothesis-generating for caudal epidural in infected pediatric patients; prospective trials needed before practice change.
Neuraxial anesthesia combined with general anesthesia has become a widely accepted method of providing effective postoperative analgesia and decreasing intraoperative anesthetic needs in the pediatric population. In clinical practice, there still appears to be hesitancy for the use of a neuraxial technique (spinal or epidural) in patients at risk for bacteremia or with an on-going systemic infection. However, evidence-based medicine lacks any data to support an increase in the risk of infectious complications following neuraxial anesthesia. We present two pediatric patients with intra-abdominal infectious processes who received caudal epidural blockade for postoperative operative analgesia. The use of neuraxial techniques in patients at risk for bacteremia is reviewed, evidence-based medicine regarding the risks of infection discussed, and the potential favorable effects of neuraxial blockade on the neurohumoral response to sepsis and the systemic inflammatory responses presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kako et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: