Why the study?
Manual echocardiography interpretation for LVH is time-consuming and prone to errors, while deep learning approaches face significant challenges regarding medical data availability.
Does an automated zero-shot and few-shot Siamese network approach improve the precision and reliability of LVH diagnosis from echocardiograms compared to state-of-the-art techniques and expert echocardiographers in patients with normal and LVH echocardiograms?
Does an automated zero-shot and few-shot Siamese network approach improve the precision and reliability of LVH diagnosis from echocardiograms compared to state-of-the-art techniques and expert echocardiographers in patients with normal and LVH echocardiograms?
A novel data-efficient deep learning approach using modified Siamese networks improves the precision and reliability of automated LVH diagnosis from echocardiograms.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a life-threatening condition in which the muscle of the left ventricle thickens and enlarges. Echocardiography is a test performed by cardiologists and echocardiographers to diagnose this condition. The manual interpretation of echocardiography tests is time-consuming and prone to errors. To address this issue, we have developed an automated LVH diagnosis technique using deep learning. However, the availability of medical data is a significant challenge due to varying industry standards, privacy laws, and legal constraints. To overcome this challenge, we have proposed a data-efficient technique for automated LVH classification using echocardiography. Firstly, we collected our own dataset of normal and LVH echocardiograms from 70 patients in collaboration with a clinical facility. Secondly, we introduced novel zero-shot and few-shot algorithms based on a modified Siamese network to classify LVH and normal images. Unlike traditional zero-shot learning approaches, our proposed method does not require text vectors, and classification is based on a cutoff distance. Our model demonstrates superior performance compared to state-of-the-art techniques, achieving up to 8% precision improvement for zero-shot learning and up to 11% precision improvement for few-shot learning approaches. Additionally, we assessed the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability scores of our proposed approach against two expert echocardiographers. The results revealed that our approach achieved better inter-observer and intra-observer reliability scores compared to the experts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farhad et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: