Why the study?
Does in vitro fertilization lead to differences in NKX2.5 and TBX5 gene mutations compared to natural conception in children with congenital heart disease?
Does in vitro fertilization lead to differences in NKX2.5 and TBX5 gene mutations compared to natural conception in children with congenital heart disease?
Assisted reproductive technology (IVF) does not appear to lead to increased mutations in the NKX2.5 and TBX5 genes in children with congenital heart disease compared to natural conception.
Suggests IVF does not drive congenital heart disease through these specific genetic mutations; leaves open whether other epigenetic.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences of NKX2.5 and TBX5 gene mutations between in vitro fertilization (IVF) children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and naturally conceived children with CHD. METHODS: Blood samples from 68 IVF children with CHD and 98 naturally conceived children with CHD were collected. The mutations in coding regions 1 and 2 of the NKX2.5 gene, and coding regions 4, 5, and 8 of the TBX5 gene were examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: An A-to-G mutation at nucleotide 63 (c.63A>G) in coding region 1 of the NKX2.5 gene was found in both IVF and naturally conceived children with CHD. There were no significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies at c.63A>G locus of the NKX2.5 gene between the two groups. No mutations were detected in coding region 2 of the NKX2.5 gene and coding regions 4, 5 and 8 of the TBX5 gene. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in NKX2.5 and TBX5 gene mutations between IVF and naturally conceived children with CHD. Therefore, it is presumed that assisted reproductive technology may not lead to mutations in the NKX2.5 and TBX5 genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: