Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The carbonyl stretching vibration, vC=O, for cyclopentanone is in Fermi resonance with a combination tone, and the amount of Fermi resonance interaction between these two modes is dependent upon the amount of solute/solvent interaction. Correction for Fermi resonance shows that vC=O for cyclopentanone decreases in frequency by approximately 17.1 cm −1 , progressing in the series of solvents from hexane through methyl alcohol. In the same series of solvents the vC=O frequency for cyclohexanone decreases in frequency by approximately 22 cm −1 , progressing through the series of solvents hexane through methyl alcohol. Moreover, the vC=O mode for cyclohexanone occurs at a lower frequency than the vC=O mode for cyclopentanone (after correction for Fermi resonance) by between 26.5 and 33.2 cm −1 , depending upon which particular solvent was used to dissolve cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone. The larger decrease in frequency for vC=O of cyclohexanone compared to vC=O for cyclopentanone in the same series of solvents is attributed to the fact that the (CH 2 ) 5 group contributes more electrons to the C=O group than does the (CH 2 ) 4 group. Consequently, the carbonyl group for cyclohexanone is more basic than the carbonyl group for cyclopentanone. Thus, there is a larger solute/solvent interaction in the case of cyclohexanone than in the case of cyclopentanone. The solvent acceptor numbers do not correlate well with the vC=O frequencies for either cyclohexanone or cyclopentanone (ACFFR).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Nyquist (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: