Why the study?
Is a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and S-amlodipine pharmacokinetically bioequivalent to concomitant administration of the two drugs in healthy adult volunteers?
Is a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and S-amlodipine pharmacokinetically bioequivalent to concomitant administration of the two drugs in healthy adult volunteers?
A fixed-dose combination of telmisartan 40 mg and S-amlodipine 5 mg is pharmacokinetically bioequivalent to and has a similar safety profile as the coadministration of the individual drugs.
Supports fixed-dose combination as interchangeable alternative; confirms bioequivalence of telmisartan/S-amlodipine.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of telmisartan and S-amlodipine with those of concomitant administration of the two drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy male Koreans. All subjects were administered an FDC tablet containing 40 mg telmisartan and 5 mg S-amlodipine and were also coadministered the same dose of both drugs given separately. The crossover study design included a 14-day washout period between the two treatments. Blood samples were collected up to 168 h following drug administration. The plasma concentrations of telmisartan and S-amlodipine were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters and plasma concentration-time curves were compared. Safety was assessed by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and patient interviews. RESULTS: ) were 0.8782 (0.8167-0.9444) and 0.9662 (0.9210-1.0136) for telmisartan and 1.0069 (0.9723-1.0427) and 1.0324 (0.9969-1.0690) for S-amlodipine, respectively. A total of 36 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 23 subjects, but no statistical differences were observed between the two treatments. The most frequently reported AE was a mild-to-moderate headache that was generally self-limiting. CONCLUSION: 90% CIs were between ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results suggest that the FDC formulation is pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and has a similar safety profile to the coadministration of these drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: