Key result
Adrenaline infusion induces regional repolarisation changes, with derived T waves strongly correlating with true electrograms.
Why the study?
The study examined the hypothesis that an interaction between adrenaline and heart rate changes alters the normal timing sequence of ventricular repolarisation in a way that may favour arrhythmia formation, explain conflicting reports of adrenaline effects on action potential duration, and be relevant to T wave abnormalities in normal people.
Adrenaline alters the normal relationship between interbeat interval and repolarisation timing in a porcine model, increasing dispersion of repolarisation which may predispose to arrhythmias.
Adrenaline-induced repolarization dispersion merits mechanistic arrhythmia studies; leaves open translation to human risk.
Study objective The aim was to examine the hypothesis that an interaction between adrenaline and change in heart rate may alter the normal time sequence of ventricular repolarisation (and hence refractoriness) in a manner that (1) may favour arrhythmia formation, (2) may partly explain conflicting reports of the effect of adrenaline, ie, there are two opposing effects on action potential duration, and (3) be relevant to T wave abnormalities that sometimes occur in normal people. Design As a measure of the time course of repolarisation, monophasic action potentials were recorded simultaneously from three epicardial sites in the porcine heart (left ventricular apex, left ventricular base, and mid right ventricle). During steady state pacing, test pulse intervals were interposed at progressively shorter intervals in order to construct restitution curves. Measurements and main results Adrenaline infusion (0.4-1.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) resulted in earlier repolarisation in the beats after shorter interbeat intervals, and delayed repolarisation after longer interbeat intervals, tending to turn the restitution curve anticlockwise (ie, there were two opposing effects on action potential duration). The effects were not homogeneous between regions. To show this inhomogeneity, pairs of monophasic action potentials from different regions were subtracted using a differential input amplifier to produce an ECG like waveform at the amplifier output. The resulting T wave was thereby a measure of the time difference in repolarisation between the monophasic action potentials from which it was derived. The inhomogeneity of repolarisation induced by adrenaline and rate change was reflected in the morphology of this derived T wave, particularly at early (premature) beats. These T wave changes correlated closely with the true T wave changes in bipolar electrograms recorded between the same recording sites (R = 0.89; p less than 0.0001). Conclusions These results show that adrenaline altered the normal relationship between interbeat interval and the timing of repolarisation. The effect was not homogeneous and when regional differences were observed they were reflected in changes in T wave morphology. These were marked at short intervals. It is possible that in addition to increased excitability observed with adrenaline, a combination of raised sympathetic activity and early beats predisposes to arrhythmias by exaggerating dispersion of repolarisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taggart et al. (1990) studied Ventricular repolarisation and arrhythmia susceptibility. Adrenaline infusion with pacing rate changes was evaluated on Time course and regional inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarisation (monophasic action potential duration restitution and derived vs true T wave morphology) (R = 0.89, p=<0.0001). Adrenaline infusion (0.4-1.5 ug/kg/min) induced regional repolarisation inhomogeneity, with derived T wave changes correlating closely with true bipolar electrogram T waves (R=0.89; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: