Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We explore the impact of in-class input on pre-literate foreign language learners’ production of second-language (L2) English vowels, comparing vowels in words newly learnt in class from a near-native speaker of Standard Southern British English (SSBE), and earlier-learnt words heard from foreign-accented speakers. We further explore if and how classroom exposure to SSBE affects learners’ first-language (L1) vowels. Over 16 weeks, we recorded seven Moravian Czech preschoolers who attended weekly English lessons. They produced words with SSBE /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ, ʌ/ and Moravian Czech /iː, i, e, a/. We modelled normalised vowel height and retraction using linear mixed effects models. In newly learnt words, participants produced L2 /ɛ/ as higher than /æ/, showing greater separation of the vowels than in earlier-learnt words. Still, /ɛ, æ/ overlap was observed, with /æ/ showing great variability. Participants raised L2 /i/ in later recordings, producing /i/ and /ɪ/ similarly in earlier-learnt and newly learnt L2 words. L1 production was recorded twice approximately nine weeks apart. Participants raised L1 /iː/ and /i/, which became more similar in height and overlapped more with L2 /i/. L1 /e/ retracted and overlapped more with L2 /æ/; L1 /a/ retracted, assimilating to L2 /ʌ/. Our findings illustrate the influence of input characteristics on child learners’ production of L2 vowels and suggest that classroom input can drive phonetic drift in young children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kucerová et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: