Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the microtubule seam acts as a line defect rather than a topological boundary, implying limitations for quantum biology.
In discussions around quantum biology and the Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) framework, a recurring hypothesis is that biological structures use unusual geometry to shield quantum states from thermal decoherence. Attention often turns to the microtubule's structural defect: the seam. Here, we analyze whether this 13-3 B-lattice register mismatch acts as a topologically protected boundary against thermal noise using standard condensed-matter criteria (such as bulk-boundary correspondence and the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger framework). We demonstrate that because both sides of the seam share the same bulk phase (Δν = 0), the seam functions as an ordinary 1D line defect rather than a protected topological domain wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Van Oppens (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: