Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 20, 2013Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery

Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DGDamien GatinelFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildYHYvette HoubrechtsUniversity of Liège

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Gatinel et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c2465050daa66a5df7d40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.048
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interpreting multifocal intraocular lens modulation transfer functions1993 · 53 citations
  2. 2Analysis of the Optical Quality of Intraocular Lenses2004 · 39 citations
  3. 3Multifocal intraocular lenses2005 · 199 citations
  4. 4In Vitro Strehl Ratios with Spherical, Aberration-Free, Average, and Customized Spherical Aberration-Correcting Intraocular Lenses2009 · 101 citations
  5. 5Long-term follow-up of a multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens after cataract surgery2008 · 84 citations