Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The high rate capability and reversibility of lithium iron phosphate battery cathodes is attributed to the highly reversible transition between its LiFePO 4 and FePO 4 phases. Conflicting models exist for the phase transition mechanism, such as the shrinking or expanding core models, surface reaction limited model, and the single-phase kinetic model. A literature review suggests that the subscribed theories depend upon the experimental methods and also the geometry and size of the LiFePO 4 particles. We study the electronic structure and disorder during the two-phase transition of commercial oval-shaped LiFePO 4 particles using in situ XAS (X-ray absorption spectroscopy) with the Δμ XANES (X-ray absorption near edge structure) difference technique along with traditional EXAFS (extended X-ray absorption fine structure) to track the Debye-Waller (DW) factor. The Δμ XANES magnitude, |Δμ|, tracks changes in the electronic structure which does not follow a synchronous path with lithium content. The magnitude of the DW shows the degree of structural disorder reaches a maximum near the middle of the charge/discharge cycle. The combined |Δμ| and EXAFS results suggests the LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 transition occurs through a "collective mosaic" or an unrelaxed "sequential" single-phase kinetic model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Love et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: