Why the study?
Individual activities of APC, thrombin, and fXa are difficult to establish due to related structures and similar substrate preferences, warranting selective chemical tools to discriminate between them in biological samples.
Novel fluorescent activity-based probes and selective substrates allow for the simultaneous detection of APC, thrombin, and factor Xa in human plasma, which may aid in developing new diagnostic tests for coagulation-related disorders.
Novel method distinguishes APC, thrombin, and fXa activities; leaves open targeted therapies in thrombosis, inflammation, and viral disease.
Activated protein C (APC), thrombin, and factor (f) Xa are vitamin K-dependent serine proteases that are key factors in blood coagulation. Moreover, they play important roles in inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and viral infections. Abnormal activity of these coagulation factors has been related to multiple conditions, such as bleeding and thrombosis, Alzheimer's disease, sepsis, multiple sclerosis, and COVID-19. The individual activities of APC, thrombin, and fXa in coagulation and in various diseases are difficult to establish since these proteases are related and have similar substrate preferences. Therefore, the development of selective chemical tools that enable imaging and discrimination between coagulation factors in biological samples may provide better insight into their roles in various conditions and potentially aid in the establishment of novel diagnostic tests. In our study, we used a large collection of unnatural amino acids, and this enabled us to extensively explore the binding pockets of the enzymes' active sites. Based on the specificity profiles obtained, we designed highly selective substrates, inhibitors, and fluorescent activity-based probes (ABPs) that were used for fast, direct, and simultaneous detection of APC, thrombin, and fXa in human plasma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Modrzycka et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: