Why the study?
Replacing vincristine with vindesine (R-CHVP) in R-CHOP has rarely been compared in efficacy and safety to determine whether it is non-inferior.
Does R-CHVP substitute for R-CHOP improve efficacy and safety in adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL?
Does R-CHVP substitute for R-CHOP improve efficacy and safety in adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL?
Substituting vincristine with vindesine in R-CHOP-like regimens for newly diagnosed DLBCL is not inferior to standard R-CHOP and shows less neurotoxicity.
May support R-CHVP as R-CHOP alternative in DLBCL; leaves open need for prospective non-inferiority trials.
Background The replacement of doxorubicin with other anthracyclines like epirubicin, pirarubicin, or liposomal adriamycin in the R-CHOP regime showed non-inferiority for DLBCL. Replacing vincristine with vindesine (R-CHVP) in R-CHOP has rarely been compared in efficacy and safety. This study aimed to figure out whether R-CHVP was non-inferior to R-CHOP in both efficacy and toxic effects. Methods This is a retrospective study performed at The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, including all consecutive adult patients aged over 18 years with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received therapy with R-CHOP or R-CHVP from March 2008 to September 2020. We compared the efficacy and safety of the R-CHVP regimen with vincristine and the R-CHOP regimen with vindesine. Results We identified 56 patients with DLBCL, including 18 patients in R-CHOP, 7 in R-CTOP, 12 in R-CEOP, 17 in R-CEVP, 11 in R-CTVP. Complete response was achieved in 12(66.7%), 4(57.1%), 5(41.7%), 7(41.2%) and 4(36.4%) patients respectively. The ORR of the five different schemes is 83.3%, 85.7%, 66.7%,64.07%,and 81.8%, respectively. The most common hematological adverse events during induction were anemia and neutropenia, and the most common non-hematological toxicity are gastrointestinal symptoms and neurotoxicity. The comparison of adverse events between R-CEOP and R-CEVP groups is as follows: the toxicity of hematological adverse events was not statistically significant; among non-hematological toxicity, the R-CEVP group was superior to the R-CEOP group in peripheral neuropathy (p=0.026). The 2-year progression-free survival were 75.5%, 54.6%, 53.2%, 62.7% and 42.4% in R-CHOP, R-CTOP, RCEOP, R-CEVP and R-CTVP group respectively. Conclusion The R-CHVP, in which vincristine was substituted by vindesine, was not inferior to the standard R-CHOP regimen and showed less neurotoxicity. Treatment regimens composed of different anthracyclines have similar therapeutic benefits and adverse events in addition to cardiotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: