Why the study?
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in ACS occurs for various reasons, including side effects and costs, prompting an assessment of its prevalence and subsequent clinical outcomes.
What is the prevalence and rate of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
What is the prevalence and rate of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel is common in real-world practice (19.8%) and is associated with generally low rates of major cardiovascular and bleeding events.
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel occurs in ~20% of ACS patients; leaves open its net clinical impact pending dedicated RCTs.
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may occur for a variety of reasons, including side effects (bleeding and non-bleeding) and costs. This study sought to assess the prevalence of de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel and the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world studies in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. Real-world data on the prevalence of de-escalation during hospitalization or at discharge, after hospital discharge, and during the whole study period were included for meta-analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding events occurring after de-escalation were also assessed. A total of 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of the prevalence of de-escalation. De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy occurred with a mean prevalence of 19.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-28.4%]. De-escalation occurred more frequently in-hospital or at discharge than after hospital discharge (23.7% vs. 15.8%). For assessment of clinical outcomes, a total of six studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of MACE for patients with de-escalation was 2.1% (95% CI 1.1-4.1%) and the rate of major bleeding events was 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-4.5%). In conclusion, de-escalation commonly occurs in real-world practice. Although rates of major cardiovascular and bleeding events in this analysis were generally low, the profile of patients suitable for de-escalation, the impact of de-escalation on adverse clinical outcomes and how this is affected by the timing after index ACS warrants further large-scale investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angiolillo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: