Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Loss of estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) might occur during the metastatic progression of ER positive and HER2 negative (ER+/HER2−) breast cancer (BC), but the underpinning molecular alterations remain elusive. We explored the genomic context of HER2− tumors with ER and/or PR loss to investigate potential drivers and actionable alterations that might help personalize treatment of ER+/HER2− BC. Methods We accessed data from metastatic HER2− BC included in the MSK-2018 dataset to compare outcome, tumor characteristics and genomic alterations of BC with loss of ER (ER+/ − , n=66) to those maintaining ER positivity (ER+/+, n=364) or ER negativity (ER−/−, n=50). We also compared metastatic ER+/+ BC with loss of PR (PR+/−, n=111) to those maintaining PR positivity (PR+/+, n=192) or PR negativity (PR−/−, n=41). Results In line with previous reports, ER+/− BC was associated with aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics and poor outcome. ER+/− BC showed significantly higher frequency of TP53 and RB1 mutations and lower frequency of PIK3CA and GATA3 mutations compared to ER+/+. ER+/− or PR+/− status was mutually exclusive with ESR1 mutations and was associated with a significantly higher tumor mutational burden. Moreover, ER+/− BC were enriched in driver alterations in the genes of the Notch and Retinoblastoma pathways and showed a significantly lower frequency of level 1 actionable alterations according to OncoKB. Conclusions Loss of ER and/or PR may identify a distinct evolutionary trajectory of ER+/HER2− metastatic progression, largely non-overlapping with ESR1 -mutant endocrine resistance. Further studies on matched primary and metastatic samples are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Migliaccio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: