In the U.S., federal and state governments perform routine inspections of nursing homes. Results of the inspections allow government to generate fines for findings of non-compliance as well as allow consumers to rank facilities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the nursing home survey process. In general, the survey data involves 191 binary deficiency variables interpreted as 'deficient' or 'non-deficient'. To reduce the dimensionality of the problem, our proposed method involves two steps. First, we reduce the deficiency categories to sub-categories using previous nursing home studies. Second, looking at the State of Kansas specifically, we take the deficiency data from 1 year, and use Bayesian latent class analysis (LCA) to collapse the sub-categories to a binary variable. We evaluate inter-rater agreement using deficiency data from two separate survey teams on one facility, a matched-pair design. We evaluate the agreement of the two raters on binary data using the weights from the LCA. This allows a two-by-two contingency analysis using a Bayesian beta-binomial model. We elicit informative prior distributions from the nursing home providers. Together, with the experimental data, this provides a posterior distribution of the kappa agreement of the raters for nursing home deficiency citation data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gajewski et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: