Key result
The interaction between female sex and diabetes on premature acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.83-2.36) was attenuated after adjusting for non-traditional psychosocial factors (OR 1.12).
Why the study?
Do psychosocial and behavioural factors contribute to the disparity in acute coronary syndrome risk among women with diabetes relative to women without diabetes and men?
Cohort (n=939)
Do psychosocial and behavioural factors contribute to the disparity in acute coronary syndrome risk among women with diabetes relative to women without diabetes and men?
Women with diabetes and premature acute coronary syndrome have a more adverse psychosocial profile compared to women without diabetes and men, which may explain their increased risk and worse outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests psychosocial screening may be particularly important for young women with diabetes; leaves open.
AIM: Diabetes is a stronger risk factor for acute coronary syndrome for women than men. We investigate whether behavioural and psychosocial factors contribute to the disparity in acute coronary syndrome risk and outcomes among women with diabetes relative to women without diabetes and men. METHODS: Among 939 participants in the GENESIS-PRAXY cohort study of premature acute coronary syndrome (age ≤ 55 years), we compared the prevalence of traditional and non-traditional factors by sex and Type 2 diabetes status. In a case-only analysis, we used generalized logit models to investigate the influence of traditional and non-traditional factors on the interaction of sex and diabetes. RESULTS: In 287 women (14.3% with diabetes) and 652 men (10.4% with diabetes), women and men with diabetes showed a heavier burden of traditional cardiac risk factors compared with individuals without diabetes. Women with diabetes were more likely to be the primary earner and have more anxiety relative to women without diabetes, and reported worse perceived health compared with women without diabetes and men with diabetes. The interaction term for sex and diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 1.40, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 0.83-2.36) was diminished after additional adjustment for non-traditional factors (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.54-2.32), but not traditional factors alone (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.84-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: We observed trends toward a more adverse psychosocial profile among women with diabetes and incident acute coronary syndrome compared with women without diabetes and men with diabetes, which may explain the increased risk of acute coronary syndrome in women with diabetes and may also contribute to worse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Premature acute coronary syndrome (n=939). Female sex and Type 2 diabetes vs. Men with diabetes and women without diabetes was evaluated on Interaction of sex and diabetes (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.83-2.36). The interaction between female sex and diabetes on premature acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.83-2.36) was attenuated after adjusting for non-traditional psychosocial factors (OR 1.12).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: