Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine the usefulness of commercially available somatomedin C levels in the evaluation of the treatment of acromegaly, 15 patients were tested at 0.25-15.4 yr after onset of therapy. Clinical response, as determined by a numerical scoring system, was compared with RIA of GH and somatomedin C. Symptomatic response was poorly correlated with somatomedin C (r = 0.033) as well as with GH (r = 0.24). The correlation of GH and somatomedin C was also poor (r = 0.46, P greater than 0.05). Eighty-three percent of patients with clinical improvement had GH less than or equal to 10 ng/ml, 50% had GH less than or equal to 5 ng/ml, while 42% had somatomedin C less than or equal to 3.0 U/ml. All patients who were evaluated at 1 yr or less after therapy had elevated somatomedin C levels with normal or near normal GH values. In contrast only 2 of 11 patients evaluated at more than 1 yr after therapy had a mild persistence of somatomedin C elevation with normal GH levels. Determination of somatomedin c costs more than GH determinations and appears to offer no apparent advantage over GH in following patients treated for acromegaly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stonesifer et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: