Key result
Anaesthesia dosing in infants aged 0-2 years requires specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations due to dramatic developmental changes in absorption, distribution, and clearance.
Understanding developmental pharmacology and utilizing postmenstrual age for maturation assessment are crucial for improving anaesthesia dosing and reducing morbidity in infants.
May guide cautious infant anaesthesia dosing; leaves open prospective validation of postmenstrual age-based models.
Anaesthesia dosing in infants (0-2 years) should be based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations and adverse effects profiles. Disease processes and treatments in this group are distinct from those in adults. Absorption, distribution and clearance change dramatically during this period because of maturation of anatomical and physiological processes as well as behavioural changes. Pharmacogenomic expression also matures in this period. Population-based and physiological-based pharmacokinetic modelling has improved the understanding of maturation and subsequent dose approximation. Postmenstrual, rather than postnatal, age is a reasonable measure for maturation. There remains a need for clinically applicable tools to assess pharmacodynamics which can provide response feedback; this has been achieved for neuromuscular monitoring, but not yet fully for depth of anaesthesia, sedation or pain. Morbidity and mortality associated with paediatric anaesthesia have historically been highest in this age group and continue to be so. Some of this morbidity was attributable to a poor understanding of developmental pharmacology; this facet continues to plague the specialty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian J. Anderson (2012) conducted a review in Paediatric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was evaluated. Anaesthesia dosing in infants aged 0-2 years requires specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations due to dramatic developmental changes in absorption, distribution, and clearance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: