Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The findings of Thomason, Arbuckle, and Cady interpreted as disproving the eye-movement hypothesis are based on a misunderstanding of the neuro-linguistic programming model. Their finding of consistent patterns tends to support the hypothesis that eye movements reflect internal processes regardless of specific stimuli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beck et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: