Ethnography in English depends on translations of the words of the people it studies. Yet in new writing on the subject there is a lack of attention to concrete translation strategies, and this weakens ethnography’s critique of representation. This study explores specifically translation-related aspects of some recent ethnographies, focusing on the way different translation strategies are implicated in the construction of the unequal relationships between source- and target-language cultures. The use of normalizing translation strategies makes claims to universality and works to ‘domesticate’ the source language. Estranging strategies have traditionally written the source-language world as dangerously alien but can also offer more subversive versions; postmodern ethnography’s reflexive mode of translation tries to undermine the authority of both ethnographer and translated text. A study of some representative texts suggests that in ethnography the mode of translation is closely bound up with the power relations between the cultures involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kate Sturge (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: