This paper examines the relative performance of two commonly used clustering methods based on maximum likelihood in the context of classifying a sample of observations of unknown origin arising from two normal populations with a common covariance matrix. the associated properties of the two methods are compared by conducting a series of simulation experiments under both mixture and separate sampling schemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gànesalingam et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: