Why the study?
Does resumption of intensive exercise training improve conduit arterial diameter in elite rowers?
Does resumption of intensive exercise training improve conduit arterial diameter in elite rowers?
Resumption of intensive training in elite athletes further enhances conduit artery diameter within 3 months, demonstrating continued structural vascular adaptation beyond baseline athletic hypertrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Resumption of training was associated with increased conduit artery diameter in elite rowers; extends observations of vascular adaptation but should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Exercise training is a known stimulus for arteriogenesis, but it is unclear whether elite athletes, who exhibit increased conduit vessel diameter at rest, experience further structural vascular adaptations as a result of intense exercise training. METHODS: Cross-sectional comparisons were performed between elite rowers (N = 17), following a respite from training, and eight untrained age- and gender-matched controls to assess the effects of long-term exercise on vessel structure. To determine the impact of the resumption of intensive exercise training on conduit artery structure, measures were repeated following 3 and 6 months of training in the athletes; the controls remained inactive. Conduit vessel structure was assessed, using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound, as brachial artery diameter at rest (BADr) and in response to 5-min (BAD5) and 10-min (BAD10) periods of forearm cuff ischemia. Shear rate profiles were also analyzed following cuff deflation at all time points. RESULTS: At entry, all measures of BAD were greater (all P < 0.05) in the athletes relative to controls (athletes vs controls; BADr 4.47 +/- 0.10 vs 3.84 +/- 0.22 mm; BAD5 4.70 +/- 0.10 vs 4.05 +/- 0.36 mm, and BAD10 4.93 +/- 0.10 vs 4.07 +/- 0.25 mm). Resumption of exercise training caused a further increase in brachial artery diameters in the athletes at 3 months (BADr, 4.71 +/- 0.10 mm, P < 0.01; BAD5 4.94 +/- 0.10 mm, P < 0.05; BAD10 5.12 +/- 0.10 mm, P < 0.001), which were maintained, but not further increased, after 6 months of training. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes exhibit enhanced conduit artery diameters at rest and in response to vasodilator stimuli. Despite this long-term training effect on arterial structure, resumption of training further enhances diameter, an effect that occurs within 3 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naylor et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: