Key result
A deep learning-based model for estimating intraoperative stroke volume outperformed the EV1000 model during severe hemodynamic instability (correlation 0.861 vs 0.570; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Stroke volume estimation by arterial blood pressure is widely used, but its accuracy is questionable during periods of hemodynamic instability.
Does a deep learning-based model improve stroke volume estimation compared to a conventional arterial contour method during periods of hemodynamic instability in liver transplantation surgeries?
Observational (n=65)
Does a deep learning-based model improve stroke volume estimation compared to a conventional arterial contour method during periods of hemodynamic instability in liver transplantation surgeries?
A deep learning-based model outperformed a conventional commercial arterial contour method for estimating stroke volume from arterial waveforms, particularly during periods of severe hemodynamic instability.
May improve estimation in instability; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Although the stroke volume (SV) estimation by arterial blood pressure has been widely used in clinical practice, its accuracy is questionable, especially during periods of hemodynamic instability. We aimed to create novel SV estimating model based on deep-learning (DL) method. A convolutional neural network was applied to estimate SV from arterial blood pressure waveform data recorded from liver transplantation (LT) surgeries. The model was trained using a gold standard referential SV measured via pulmonary artery thermodilution method. Merging a gold standard SV and corresponding 10.24 seconds of arterial blood pressure waveform as an input/output data set with 2-senconds of sliding overlap, 484,384 data sets from 34 LT surgeries were used for training and validation of DL model. The performance of DL model was evaluated by correlation and concordance analyses in another 491,353 data sets from 31 LT surgeries. We also evaluated the performance of pre-existing commercialized model (EV1000), and the performance results of DL model and EV1000 were compared. The DL model provided an acceptable performance throughout the surgery (r = 0.813, concordance rate = 74.15%). During the reperfusion phase, where the most severe hemodynamic instability occurred, DL model showed superior correlation (0.861; 95% Confidence Interval, (CI), 0.855–0.866 vs. 0.570; 95% CI, 0.556–0.584, P < 0.001) and higher concordance rate (90.6% vs. 75.8%) over EV1000. In conclusion, the DL-based model was superior for estimating intraoperative SV and thus might guide physicians to precise intraoperative hemodynamic management. Moreover, the DL model seems to be particularly promising because it outperformed EV1000 in circumstance of rapid hemodynamic changes where physicians need most help.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moon et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hemodynamic instability during liver transplantation (n=65). Deep learning-based stroke volume estimation model vs. Pre-existing commercialized model (EV1000) was evaluated on Correlation of stroke volume estimation during the reperfusion phase (p=<0.001). A deep learning-based model for estimating intraoperative stroke volume outperformed the EV1000 model during severe hemodynamic instability (correlation 0.861 vs 0.570; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: