Key result
There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend routine primary preventive strategies with medication or lifestyle interventions in unselected adult patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncological therapies.
Why the study?
Definitive evidence for pre-treatment assessment and preventive management strategies for cancer patients at increased risk for CVD is largely lacking, impeding firm recommendations.
Do primary prevention strategies and predictive risk scores reduce cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients?
Do primary prevention strategies and predictive risk scores reduce cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients?
Current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine primary pharmacological prevention of cardiotoxicity in unselected adult cancer patients, highlighting the need for targeted trials in high-risk groups.
No routine primary prevention in unselected patients; leaves open targeted trials in high-risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment-related morbidity relevantly compromises health status in cancer survivors, and efforts to optimise health-related outcomes in this population are vital to maximising healthy survivorship. A pre-treatment assessment - and possibly preventive management strategies - of cancer patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems a rational approach in this regard. Definitive evidence for such strategies is largely lacking, thereby impeding the formulation of firm recommendations. RESULTS: The current scoping review aims to summarise and grade the evidence regarding strategies for prediction and prevention of CVD in adults in relation to oncological treatments. We conducted a scoping literature search for different strategies for primary prevention, such as medical and lifestyle interventions, as well as the use of predictive risk scores. We identified studies with moderate to good strength and up to now limited evidence to recommend primary preventive strategies in unselected patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncologic therapies. CONCLUSION: Efforts to minimize the CVD burden in cancer survivors are needed to accomplish healthy survivorship. This can be done by means of robust models predictive for CVD events or application of interventions during or after oncological treatments. Up to now there is insufficient evidence to implement preventive strategies in an unselected group of patients treated with potential cardiotoxic oncological treatments. We conclude that randomised controlled trials are needed that evaluate medical and lifestyle interventions in groups at increased risk for complications, in order to be able to influence chronic illness risks, such as cardiovascular complications, for cancer survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altena et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cancer treatment-related cardiovascular morbidity. Primary preventive strategies (medical and lifestyle interventions) and predictive risk scores vs. Standard care or placebo was evaluated. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend routine primary preventive strategies with medication or lifestyle interventions in unselected adult patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncological therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: