Why the study?
Does the presence of coronary collateral circulation improve corrected QT dispersion in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Does the presence of coronary collateral circulation improve corrected QT dispersion in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Contrary to expectations, well-developed coronary collateral circulation in chronic CAD is associated with increased, rather than decreased, QT dispersion, suggesting a potential arrhythmogenic risk.
Developed collaterals associated with higher QTcD may indicate arrhythmogenic risk in severe CAD; challenges protective assumptions and leaves open prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on QT dispersion (QTD) in coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: A prolonged QTD has been linked to increased heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization implicated in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias and has been associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. METHOD: CCC and corrected QTD (QTcD) were established in patients who had at least 85% stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery or in proximal part or in the body of the right coronary artery. Furthermore, left ventricular function score was determined for all the patients. RESULTS: While CCC was not present (CCC grade 0) in 32 patients, 68 patients were observed with CCC (CCC grade > or =1). Mean QTcD was higher in patients who had CCC grade > or =1 than in patients with grade 0 (64.3+/-3.5 and 46.8+/-2.7, respectively, P=0.002). We detected a significant correlation between the collateral score and QTcD (r=0.354, P=0.001). CCC grade > or =1 patients had higher mean left ventricular function scores than grade 0 patients (P=0.048). Left ventricular function score and QTcD were observed to be correlated (r=0.200, P=0.046). CONCLUSION: CCC in chronic coronary artery disease was not established to have a positive decreasing effect on QTcD. On the contrary, QTcD values were observed to be even higher in patients with well developed CCC. Further research including larger series and long-term follow-up is required to investigate this issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tandoğan et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: