Key result
Radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) accurately predicted FFR≤0.80 (AUC=0.97), outperforming resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90) and cFFR (P<0.01).
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine whether contrast FFR plus intracoronary nitroglycerin could accurately predict coronary stenosis functional assessment and provide superior diagnostic agreement with FFR compared to non-hyperemic indexes and contrast-mediated FFR.
Does radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) accurately predict FFR for coronary stenosis functional assessment compared to non-hyperemic indexes and cFFR?
Observational (n=266)
Yes
Does radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) accurately predict FFR for coronary stenosis functional assessment compared to non-hyperemic indexes and cFFR?
Contrast FFR plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) is a highly accurate, adenosine-free alternative for the physiological assessment of coronary stenosis.
May support adenosine-free FFR assessment in practice; hypothesis-generating from observational data and requires randomized validation.
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the "gold standard" for assessing the physiological significance of coronary disease. In the last decade, several alternative adenosine-free indexes have been proposed in order to facilitate the dissemination of the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. Our aim was to investigate whether radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) can predict functional assessment of coronary stenosis offering superior diagnostic agreement with FFR compared to non-hyperemic indexes and contrast mediated FFR (cFFR). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-nine lesions evaluated with pressure wire in 266 patients were prospectively included in this multicenter study. RESULTS: The ROC curves for cFFR-NTG using an FFR≤0.80 showed a higher accuracy in predicting FFR (AUC=0.97) than resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90, P<0.01) and cFFR (AUC=0.93.5, P<0.01). A significant (P<0.01) strong correlation was found between FFR and the four analyzed indexes: Pd/Pa (r=0.78); iFR/RFR (r=0.73); cFFR(r=0.89) and cFFR-NTG (r=0.93). cFFR-NTG showed the closest agreement at Bland-Altman analysis. The cFFR-NTG cut off value >0.84 showed the highest negative predictive value (88%), specificity (91%), sensitivity (94%) and accuracy (92%) of the studied indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Submaximal hyperemic adenosine-free indexes are an efficient alternative to adenosine for the physiological assessment of epicardial coronary disease. The most accurate index in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis using FFR as reference was cFFR-NTG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutiérrez et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Coronary stenosis (n=266). Radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) vs. Resting Pd/Pa, iFR/RFR, and contrast mediated FFR (cFFR) was evaluated on Accuracy in predicting FFR ≤0.80 (AUC 0.97, p=<0.01). Radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) accurately predicted FFR≤0.80 (AUC=0.97), outperforming resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90) and cFFR (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: