Four commercial systems for the identification of glucose nonfermentative, gram-negative bacilli and the conventional system used in our laboratory were compared. The API 20E, Roche Oxi/Ferm Tube, BBL Minitek, Flow N/F System, and our system were compared for accuracy, time needed for identification and number of isolates needing additional testing. A total of 241 different isolates were used. The API 20E identified 86.7% correctly; Oxi/FermTube, 83.0%; Minitek, 93.4%; N/F System, 90.5%; and our system, 90.0%. Within 24 hours after isolation, the API 20E identified 25.7%; Oxi/Ferm Tube and Minitek, 0%; N/F System 27.3%; and our system, 35.7%. After 48 hours, the API 20E identified 74.7%; Oxi/Ferm Tube, 35.7%; Minitek, 45.2%; N/F System, 83.0%; and our system, 94.6%. The number of isolates that required additional testing for identification by the API 20E was 119; Oxi/Ferm Tube, 161; Minitek, 88; N/F System, 43; and our system, 36. Ease of performance, technologist time, and level of identification required by individual laboratories are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burdash et al. (1980) studied this question.