Key result
Genetics of LDL-C, Lp(a), and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins align with CVD risk, unlike HDL-C.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate whether new and known genetic determinants of plasma levels of LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and HDL cholesterol associate with the risk of cardiovascular disease expected from the effect on lipoprotein levels. Concordance or discordance of such genetic determinants with cardiovascular disease risk will either favor or disfavor that these lipoproteins are causally related to cardiovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence for concordance or discordance with cardiovascular disease risk has come from Mendelian randomization studies, whereas indirect evidence also has emerged from genome-wide and candidate gene association studies. The major limitations of studies of genetic variation and concordance or discordance with cardiovascular disease are pleiotropic effects of the variants studied, and/or lack of sufficient statistical power of the majority of studies to firmly demonstrate a positive association, or even more difficult, to exclude an association. SUMMARY: New and known genetic determinants of plasma levels of LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are concordant with both the magnitude and direction of the expected risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas this is unclear for HDL cholesterol. The data are compatible with cardiovascular disease causality for the three former lipoprotein classes, but not for HDL cholesterol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordestgaard et al. (2011) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Genetic determinants of plasma levels of LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and HDL cholesterol was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease risk. Genetic determinants of LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (3 lipoprotein classes) are concordant with expected cardiovascular disease risk, unlike HDL cholesterol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: