Key result
Combined therapy with andexanet alfa and rtPA led to complete neurological recovery (NIHSS score improved from 8 to 0 in 70 minutes) in a patient with acute ischemic stroke on active rivaroxaban.
Why the study?
Patients with non-large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke on oral anticoagulants represent the largest group ineligible for reperfusion therapy even with early hospital arrival.
Does combined andexanet alfa and rtPA improve neurological outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke on active rivaroxaban therapy?
Case Report (n=1)
Does combined andexanet alfa and rtPA improve neurological outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke on active rivaroxaban therapy?
This case report provides the first evidence that combining andexanet alfa and rtPA can lead to rapid and complete neurological recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients on active rivaroxaban therapy.
Suggests feasibility of andexanet alfa before rtPA in rivaroxaban stroke; leaves open safety and efficacy in prospective trials.
Patients with non-large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (NL-AIS) on oral anticoagulants (OAC) constitute the biggest portion among those who cannot receive any potential-reperfusion treatment even if they appear early in the hospital. We present the first case of therapy for NL-AIS in a patient with active anti-Xa anticoagulation, combining andexanet alfa and rtPA, who was recruited for STRoke On AntiCoagulants for Thrombolysis (acronym: STROACT), an ongoing therapeutic trial for non-LVO ischemic stroke on a DOAC. This is also the first report of the use of andexanet alfa-rtPA for AIS in a patient on rivaroxaban, which is the most frequently used non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant. The patient received the intravenous bolus of 800 mg of andexanet (contralateral arm), followed by a bolus of rtPA (10% of the calculated dose; ipsilateral arm), then a continuous infusion of andexanet at 8 mg/min for 120 min (contralateral arm), and rtPA (90% of the calculated dose; ipsilateral arm)-both stopped after completion of 38.9 and 74% of infusion dose, respectively, due to the severe adverse event related to the administration of rtPA. In this schema, both infusions are ongoing concurrently for approximately 60 min, and then andexanet is administered alone until the completion of the dose (altogether lasting approximately 3 h). The therapy was spectacularly effective, with early and complete improvement in NIHSS from 8 to 0 points in 70 min from the initiation of the therapy; mRS = 0. Obviously, a single case cannot drive any standard therapeutic decisions, but the experience we share in this article may help manage selected special clinical problems, especially when a patient's expected outcome is poor and there is no other way to help than experimentally. Additionally, it seems a valuable addition to recent meta-data on thrombolysis in anticoagulated patients. Trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu. Identifier: 2020-004898-41. Date of registration: March 31, 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaszewski et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Acute ischemic stroke (non-LVO) on active rivaroxaban therapy (n=1). Andexanet alfa and rtPA was evaluated on Neurological improvement (NIHSS score). Combined therapy with andexanet alfa and rtPA led to complete neurological recovery (NIHSS score improved from 8 to 0 in 70 minutes) in a patient with acute ischemic stroke on active rivaroxaban.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: