Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ability of listeners to detect a temporal gap in a 1600-Hz-wide noiseband (target) was studied as a function of the absence and presence of concurrent stimulation by a second 1600-Hz-wide noiseband (distractor) with a nonoverlapping spectrum. Gap detection thresholds for single noisebands centered on 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 5.0 kHz were in the range from 4 to 6 ms, and were comparable to those described in previous studies. Gap thresholds for the same target noisebands were only modestly improved by the presence of a synchronously gated gap in a second frequency band. Gap thresholds were unaffected by the presence of a continuous distractor that was either proximate or remote from the target frequency band. Gap thresholds for the target noiseband were elevated if the distractor noiseband also contained a gap which "roved" in time in temporal proximity to the target gap. This effect was most marked in inexperienced listeners. Between-channel gap thresholds, obtained using leading and trailing markers that differed in frequency, were high in all listeners, again consistent with previous findings. The data are discussed in terms of the levels of the auditory perceptual processing stream at which the listener can voluntarily access auditory events in distinct frequency channels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillips et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: